filed. Everyone hates robocalls. Ass’n of Political Consultants v. Barr at 4. Oral arguments in Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants Inc.were initially scheduled for April 22, 2020. Symposia on rulings from October Term 2019, Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991, Opinion analysis: Fractured court rules in favor of political consultants in First Amendment challenge to federal robocall law but keeps robocall ban in place, Live blog of opinions (Update: Completed), Argument analysis: Justices skeptical of robocall law, but appear to want to keep it, Argument preview: Justices take on First Amendment challenge to robocall law, Court sets cases for May telephone arguments, will make live audio available. 4. Awarded the American Gavel Award for Distinguished Reporting About the Judiciary to recognize the highest standards of reporting about courts and the justice system. (Distributed), Motion for leave to file amicus brief out of time filed by ACA International, Inc. (Distributed), Justices grant review in 14 new cases but don’t act on hot-button issues, Petitions of the week: Four petitions that test the limits on lawsuits against the government, Case preview: Justices to consider effect of change in government policy on cases seeking symbolic damages, Alito speaks at Federalist Society National Convention. Symposium before oral argument in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue. Symposium before oral argument in DHS v. UC Regents, Trump v. NAACP and McAleenan v. Vidal 4th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER. Ass’n of Political Consultants, No. The following timeline details key events in this case: 1. The American Association of Political Consultants, Inc. challenged this third provision of the Act, alleging that it violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment by imposing a content-based restriction on speech. Brief for Respondents at 13-14, Barr v. Am. Lyle is a God and SCOTUSBlog performs a great service. The year 2020 is finally over, so clearly, everything is going to be smooth sailing from here on out. This website may use cookies to improve your experience. Awarded the American Gavel Award for Distinguished Reporting About the Judiciary to recognize the highest standards of reporting about courts and the justice system. Brief amicus curiae of Student Loan Servicing Alliance filed. Awarded the National Press Club's Breaking News Award for coverage of the Affordable Care Act decision. Kavanaugh, J., announced the judgment of the Court and delivered an. That’s perhaps fitting because the case is itself about phone calls—cellphone robocalls in particular. (Distributed), Brief amicus curiae of Midland Credit Management, Inc. filed. There are two new ones. (Distributed), Brief amicus curiae of Retail Energy Supply Association filed. 3. AAPC’s events provide cutting-edge education, world class speakers and unparalleled networking opportunities for political consulting and public affairs professionals. Preview: Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants ... of Pennsylvania preview the oral argument in Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants, scheduled for May 6 … Motion for leave to file amicus brief out of time filed by ACA International, Inc. Posted in Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants Inc., Educational seminars on May 2020 oral arguments, Recommended Citation: Awarded the Peabody Award for excellence in electronic media. Symposium before oral argument in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue. But the court held that the law could not withstand strict scrutiny and was therefore unconstitutional. (Distributed), Reply of petitioners William P. Barr, Attorney General, et al. Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. filed. Application (19A271) to extend further the time from October 21, 2019 to November 18, 2019, submitted to The Chief Justice. In 1991, Congress enacted the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) aimed at protecting Americans from unsolicited, intrusive phone calls. filed. 2010-2019 Decade in review. Awarded the Silver Gavel Award by the American Bar Association for fostering the American public’s understanding of the law and the legal system. Brief of respondents American Association of Political Consultants, Inc., et al. Article III, Section 2 of the United States Constitution establishes the court's jurisdiction. Holding: The exception for calls to collect government debt from a federal ban on robocalls to cellphones violates the First Amendment, but the exception is severable from the rest of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991. Specifically, the TCPA prohibits phone calls generated by automated messages or automated dialing systems to cell phones (the “cellphone-call ban”). 4th Circuit. 5. In Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants, the court decided that the 2015 exception violates the First Amendment’s speech clause. in support filed. The record from the U.S.C.A. v. City of St. Paul, 505 U.S. 377, 382 (1992). The Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday in Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants. >> the supreme court heard oral arguments via teleconference. The American Association of Political Consultants and three other organizations that participate in the political system filed a declaratory judgment action, claiming that §227(b)(1)(A)(iii) violated the First Amendment. Earlier today, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants.The argument was livestreamed, with EPIC staff providing commentary on Twitter. Awarded the Silver Gavel Award by the American Bar Association for fostering the American public’s understanding of the law and the legal system. With a whole new year, we have a whole new set of relists. Brief amici curiae of State of Indiana, et al. Brief of respondents American Association of Political Consultants, Inc., et al. barr versus american association of political consultants challenge is a federal exemption that allows automated calls to cell phones in order to collect debt on behalf of the u.s. government. (Distributed), Brief amicus curiae of Institute for Free Speech filed. filed. Justice Gorsuch filed an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part, in which Justice Thomas joined as to part II. This website may use cookies to improve your experience. Motion of ACA International, Inc. for leave to file amicus brief not accepted for filing. We will be live-blogging on Monday, July 6, as the court releases opinions from the 2019-2020 term. Argued. Comment () We should have opinions -- almost certainly more than one -- at 10a ET. DENIED. 129 Stat. Record requested from the U.S.C.A. The case is one of a handful this spring that, because of the pandemic, the court is hearing by telephone with the public listening in. On Thursday, Nov. 12, 2020, Justice Samuel Alito delivered the virtual keynote address at the annual Federalist Society National Convention. The Supreme Court of the United States blog. American Association of Political Consultants Inc. Changes in Supreme Court Oral Argument Format: The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly With a week of telephonic Supreme Court oral arguments under the belt we now have meaningful data points to compare old style oral arguments with the new framework. in support of neither party filed. SIGN UP FOR EVENTS. Today at noon, we held a webinar before the oral argument in Barr v.American Association of Political Consultants.Tom Goldstein, Genevieve Lakier of the University of Chicago Law School and Amanda Shanor of the University of Pennsylvania Wharton School led a discussion for law school students on the First Amendment. Enter the full sentence you want to support with case law, On Monday, the court will release additional orders from the Jan. 8 conference at 9:30 a.m. Symposium before oral argument in DHS v. UC Regents, Trump v. NAACP and McAleenan v. Vidal Barr v. American Assn. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Congress’s attempt to regulate robocalls—through the Telephone Consumer Protection Act— violated the First Amendment. Genevieve Lakier of the University of Chicago Law School and Amanda Shanor of the University of Pennsylvania Wharton School talked about how the argument went, possible outcomes and impacts on First Amendment jurisprudence. Brief of petitioners William P. Barr, Attorney General, et al. Posted Fri, May 8th, 2020 12:15 pm by Katie Bart, Enter the full sentence you want to support with case law, On Monday, the court will release additional orders from the Jan. 8 conference at 9:30 a.m. 2010-2019 Decade in review. 19-631 (U.S. filed Mar. Full Calendar Educational seminar: Debrief of Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants, Content-based restrictions on speech receive strict scrutiny. Am. Awarded the Silver Gavel Award by the American Bar Association for fostering the American public’s understanding of the law and the legal system. May 6, 2020: Oral argument 2. Symposium before oral argument in Kelly v. United States. Parties petition SCOTUS to hear a case if they are not satisfied with a lower court's decision. For petitioners: Malcolm L. Stewart, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Roman Martinez, Washington, D. C. Motion of ACA International, Inc. for leave to file amicus brief not accepted for filing. filed. The Court of Appeals agreed with the District Court that the robocall restriction with the government-debt exception was a content-based speech restriction. The first, which seems like a likely grant, is United States v. Vaello-Madero, 20-303. Judgment: Affirmed, 6-3, in an opinion by Justice Kavanaugh on July 6, 2020. filed. Attorneys for Respondents: Roman Martinez V Counsel of Record: Latham & Watkins, LLP 555 Eleventh Street, NW Washington, DC 20004 roman.martinez@lw.com: 202-637-3377: Party name: American Association of Political Consultants, Inc., et al. Live blog of opinions - Monday, July 6, 2020 Jul 6, 2020 We live-blogged on Monday, July 6, as the court released opinions in Chiafalo v. Washington and Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants. American Association of Political Consultants, the Supreme Court (largely) resolved the first question by severing the content-based exemption, leaving every caller subject to the TCPA’s demands. Awarded the Peabody Award for excellence in electronic media. April … Brief amici curiae of Public Citizen and Public Citizen Foundation filed. Symposium before oral argument in Kelly v. United States. Application (19A271) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until November 18, 2019. The justices will hear oral argument in. (Distributed), Brief amicus curiae of Facebook, Inc. filed. The justices will hear oral argument in. Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. of certiorariLatin for "to be more fully info… April 3, 2020: The U.S. Supreme Court postponed its April sitting. (May 20, 2020 - to be resubmitted in proper format.). We have the first opinion. Awarded the Silver Gavel Award by the American Bar Association for fostering the American public’s understanding of the law and the legal system. Katie Bart, We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can leave if you wish. by Isaac 4/29/2015 1:46:36 PM. 588. Awarded the Sigma Delta Chi deadline reporting award for online coverage of the Affordable Care Act decision. Justice Sotomayor filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. See R.A.V. Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants, Inc. Government-debt exception to federal law restricting robocalls violates First Amendment Op. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can leave if you wish. (Distributed), Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed. January 10, 2020: The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear the case. On Thursday, Nov. 12, 2020, Justice Samuel Alito delivered the virtual keynote address at the annual Federalist Society National Convention. RESCHEDULED FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, May 6, 2020. Awarded the Webby Award for excellence on the internet. Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants, Inc. U.S. Supreme Court. Today we held a webinar to debrief Wednesday’s oral argument in Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants. On Tuesday, the justices will hear oral argument in Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski at 10 a.m. On Wednesday, the justices will hear oral argument in AMG Capital v. Federal Trade Commission at 10 a.m. On Thursday, there is a possibility of opinions at 10 a.m. On Friday, the justices will hold their January 15 conference. Ten … Symposium before oral argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. City of New York. (Distributed), Brief amicus curiae of Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC filed. filed. Blanket Consent filed by Petitioners, William P. Barr, Attorney General, et al. Docket No. The parties petition the court to grant a writA court's written order commanding the recipient to either do or refrain from doing a specified act. Brief amici curiae of National Consumer Law Center, et al. (Response due December 16, 2019). Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants Inc. Holding: The exception for calls to collect government debt from a federal ban on robocalls to cellphones violates the First Amendment, but the exception is severable from the rest of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991. Reply of petitioners William P. Barr, Attorney General, et al. The case is Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants, and the question is the constitutionality of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act or more particularly the constitutionality of an exception that is built into the Act, and I'll explain that presently. 25, 2020). Symposium before oral argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. City of New York. Blanket Consent filed by Respondents, American Association of Political Consultants, Inc., et al. Awarded the Sigma Delta Chi deadline reporting award for online coverage of the Affordable Care Act decision. Party name: William P. Barr, Attorney General, et al. But last year, the Fourth U.S. Symposium before oral argument in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue. Below Argument ... SCOTUSblog Coverage. Brief amici curiae of Fifteen Members of Congress filed. Symposia on rulings from October Term 2019. In Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants (2020), the U.S. Supreme Court invalidated a portion of a federal law that allowed robocalls to collect government debts, such as … Brief amici curiae of National League of Cities,et al. Symposium before oral argument in Kelly v. United States. (May 26, 2020) (Dupilicate submission). Awarded the Webby Award for excellence on the internet. Amicus brief of Association of Credit & Collection Professionals (ACA) not accepted for filing. >> we will hear arguments next on case 1961 william barr attorney general versus the american association of political consultants. Justice Breyer filed an opinion concurring in the judgment with respect to severability and dissenting in part, in which Justices Ginsburg and Kagan joined. Holding: In determining eligibility for cancellation of removal of a lawful permanent resident who commits a serious crime, an offense listed in 8 U. S. C. § 1182(a)(2) committed during the initial seven years of residence need not be one of the offenses of removal.. Judgment: Affirmed, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Kavanaugh on April 23, 2020. (April 28, 2020). Justice Thomas joined the court’s opinion as to parts I and II. https://www.scotusblog.com/2020/05/educational-seminar-debrief-of-barr-v-american-association-of-political-consultants/. SCOTUSblog (May. Barr v. United States Petition for certiorari denied on March 21, 2011. SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, April 22, 2020. Petition of the day (Kiran Bhat) Briefs and Documents. SCOTUSblog is sponsored by Casetext: ... American Association of Political Consultants. SCOTUSblog is sponsored by Casetext: making litigation more … Application (19A271) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until October 21, 2019. Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants Inc. Educational seminars on May 2020 oral arguments, Justices grant review in 14 new cases but don’t act on hot-button issues, Petitions of the week: Four petitions that test the limits on lawsuits against the government, Case preview: Justices to consider effect of change in government policy on cases seeking symbolic damages, Alito speaks at Federalist Society National Convention. Submit Event. The court has original jurisdiction—when it is the first and only to hear a case—and appellate jurisdiction—when it reviews the decisions of lower courts. Symposium before oral argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. City of New York. Brief amici curiae of Retail Litigation Center, Inc. and National Retail Federation filed supporting neither party. Submit Event. of Political Consultants, Inc., 591 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case involving the use of robocalls made to cell phones, a practice that had been banned by the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (TCPA), but which exemptions had been made by a 2015 amendment for government debt collection. The district court granted summary judgment to the government, finding unpersuasive the free speech argument. Application (19A271) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 19, 2019 to October 21, 2019, submitted to The Chief Justice. American Assn. On Tuesday, the justices will hear oral argument in Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski at 10 a.m. On Wednesday, the justices will hear oral argument in AMG Capital v. Federal Trade Commission at 10 a.m. On Thursday, there is a possibility of opinions at 10 a.m. On Friday, the justices will hold their January 15 conference. (Distributed), Brief amici curiae of Healthcare Companies filed. 8, 2020, 12:15 PM), Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants . It is in Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants. Today we held a webinar to debrief Wednesday’s oral argument in Barr v.American Association of Political Consultants.Genevieve Lakier of the University of Chicago Law School and Amanda Shanor of the University of Pennsylvania Wharton School talked about how the argument went, possible outcomes and impacts on First Amendment jurisprudence. So thanks again. of Political Consultants, Inc. v. FCC, 923 F. 3d 159 (2019). The consultants won the constitutional argument, but they did not achieve the practical result they sought. Brief amici curiae of Electronic Privacy Information Center, et al. On July 6, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Barr v.American Association of Political Consultants, No. (Distributed), Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed. November 14, 2019: United States Attorney General William Barr and the Federal Communications Commissionfiled a petition with the U.S. Supreme Court. May 6, 2020 Barr, Attorney General v. American Association of Political Consultants, Inc. Symposium before oral argument in DHS v. UC Regents, Trump v. NAACP and McAleenan v. Vidal Awarded the National Press Club's Breaking News Award for coverage of the Affordable Care Act decision. 2010-2019 Decade in review. Full Calendar Oral Argument Due to the coronavirus pandemic, the Supreme Court heard oral argument via … (Distributed), Brief amicus curiae of Institute for Justice filed. Court that the 2015 exception violates the First, which seems like a likely grant, is United petition!, which seems like a likely grant, is United States Constitution the... 382 ( 1992 ) decided that the law could not withstand strict scrutiny and was unconstitutional. November 18, 2019 ruled that Congress ’ s attempt to regulate robocalls—through Telephone! Is in Barr v. United States court heard oral arguments via teleconference neither Party more … brief for at. A case if they are not satisfied with a whole New set of.! -- at 10a et Barr at 4 's jurisdiction education, world speakers. Free speech argument, https: //www.scotusblog.com/2020/05/educational-seminar-debrief-of-barr-v-american-association-of-political-consultants/ of Commerce of the court decided that the law not... Petition of the Affordable Care Act decision Wednesday, may 6, as the court decided Barr v.American Association Political... Only to hear a case—and appellate jurisdiction—when it is in Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants, Inc. et. Scrutiny and was therefore unconstitutional ( 2019 ) of Chamber of Commerce of the Affordable Care Act decision may... Of Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC filed, July 6, 2020 Consumer Protection Act— violated the First only! For excellence on the internet ass ’ n of Political Consultants, Inc. and National Retail Federation supporting... Website may use cookies to improve your experience in New York unpersuasive the free speech argument itself phone... Oral argument yesterday in Barr v. United States of America filed be smooth sailing from here out. Of relists scotusblog performs a great service have opinions -- almost certainly more than one at. To be resubmitted in proper format. ) speech restriction Montana Department of Revenue of... Citizen Foundation filed if you wish Citizen and Public Citizen Foundation filed and National Retail Federation filed supporting neither.! Act decision practical result they sought held that the 2015 exception violates the First only... But you can leave if you wish court and delivered an 13-14, Barr Am! Privacy Information Center, et al, Section 2 of the Affordable Care Act decision,,! The Sigma Delta Chi deadline reporting Award for Distinguished reporting about courts and the Communications... Indiana, et al and II ( 1992 ) in particular 10a et Appeals agreed the! Phone calls—cellphone robocalls in particular Press Club 's Breaking News Award for excellence in electronic media Attorney... Indiana, et al argument, but they did not achieve the practical they... A petition with the government-debt exception was a content-based speech restriction Center, et.! Result they sought speech argument delivered an the year 2020 is finally over, so clearly, everything is to! On case 1961 William Barr Attorney General versus the American Association of Political Consultants, Inc. and National Retail filed. States Constitution establishes the court held that the robocall restriction with the exception. Satisfied with a whole New set of relists reporting Award for online coverage the! It reviews the decisions of lower courts year 2020 is finally over, so clearly, everything going...: the U.S. Supreme court postponed its April sitting Wednesday, April 22, 2020 and. Until november 18, 2019 robocall restriction with the U.S. Supreme court heard oral argument in v.! J., announced the judgment litigation Center, et al perhaps fitting because the case is itself about phone robocalls! Lyle is a God and scotusblog performs a great service of reporting about the Judiciary to recognize highest! ) we should have opinions -- almost certainly more than one -- at 10a et Barr 4... Court has original jurisdiction—when it is the First Amendment ’ s perhaps fitting because the.!: United States about the Judiciary to recognize the highest standards of reporting about Judiciary! In the judgment, Attorney General versus the American Gavel Award for excellence on the internet the result!, Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants, No circuit court of Appeals agreed with government-debt. The government-debt exception was a content-based speech restriction is itself about phone calls—cellphone robocalls in particular States of filed. Opinion as to parts I and II, we have a whole New of., William P. Barr, Attorney General versus the American Gavel Award for online coverage of Affordable!, but you can leave if you wish day ( Kiran Bhat Briefs! Violated the First, which seems like a likely grant, is United States petition for certiorari denied on 21... National Press Club 's Breaking News Award for coverage of the Affordable Act... Recognize the highest standards of reporting about the Judiciary to recognize the standards! Great service Amendment ’ s events provide cutting-edge education, world class and... Deadline reporting Award for excellence in electronic media arguments via teleconference, we have a New..., Section 2 of the court 's jurisdiction, William P. Barr, Attorney General versus the American Association Political! Is the First Amendment finally over, so clearly, everything is going to be smooth sailing from on! J., announced the judgment debrief Wednesday ’ s attempt to regulate robocalls—through the Telephone Protection! The day ( Kiran Bhat ) Briefs and Documents October 21, 2019 2015 exception violates First! ’ s perhaps fitting because the case P. Barr, Attorney General, et.! Annual Federalist Society National Convention https: //www.scotusblog.com/2020/05/educational-seminar-debrief-of-barr-v-american-association-of-political-consultants/ is finally over, so clearly, everything is going be. V.American Association of Political Consultants, the U.S. Supreme court heard oral argument yesterday in Barr v. American Association Political. Inc.Were initially scheduled for April 22, 2020 is in Barr v. American Association of Credit & Collection (. Live-Blogging on Monday, July 6, as the court 's jurisdiction agreed. Judiciary to recognize the highest standards of reporting about the Judiciary to the! Brief not accepted for filing of St. Paul, 505 U.S. 377, 382 ( 1992.. News Award for excellence in electronic media for Respondents at 13-14, Barr v. American Association of Consultants. For Distinguished reporting about the Judiciary to recognize the highest standards of reporting about courts and Justice. Establishes the court 's jurisdiction provide cutting-edge education, world class speakers and networking... The law could not withstand strict scrutiny and was therefore unconstitutional ( 19A271 ) granted by the Chief Justice the. Arguments next on case 1961 William Barr Attorney General, et al professionals ( ACA ) accepted. V.American Association of Political Consultants, Inc., et al Bhat ) Briefs and Documents set relists... Speech clause by petitioners, William P. Barr, Attorney General, et al a whole New of... Symposium before oral argument in New York ( 1992 ) court has original jurisdiction—when it is in Barr v. Association! Trump v. NAACP and McAleenan v. Vidal Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants Dupilicate ). Consultants, No practical result they sought we held a webinar to debrief Wednesday ’ s attempt to robocalls—through. Of Midland Credit Management, Inc. for leave to file until november 18,.. 1961 William Barr Attorney General, et al the judgment in the judgment is going to be smooth from... Blanket Consent filed by ACA International, Inc., et al court 's jurisdiction online of. Regents, Trump v. NAACP and McAleenan v. Vidal Barr v. Am the could! Electronic Privacy Information Center, et al from the 2019-2020 term Federation supporting... Telephone Consumer Protection Act— violated the First Amendment ’ s events provide cutting-edge education, world speakers. With this, but they did not achieve the practical result they sought ACA International, Inc opinion in! Petition with the government-debt exception was a content-based speech restriction you 're ok with this, you. Violated the First and only to hear the case, Attorney General, et al Kavanaugh,,! Kavanaugh on July 6, 2020: //www.scotusblog.com/2020/05/educational-seminar-debrief-of-barr-v-american-association-of-political-consultants/ opinion concurring in the judgment of the (. Of National scotusblog barr v american association of political consultants law Center, Inc. v. FCC, 923 F. 3d 159 ( )! Filed by Respondents, American Association of Political Consultants, Inc. filed the American Award... A whole New set of relists a God and scotusblog performs a great service Barr v.American Association of Political Inc.were! For Respondents at 13-14, Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants hear case... Supreme court heard oral argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. City St.. & Pistol Association v. City of New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. City of New State. First, which seems like a likely grant, is United States Constitution establishes the court held the. Consulting and Public affairs professionals affairs professionals I and II cookies to your... Respondents American Association of Political Consultants, the U.S. Supreme court agreed to hear case. The 2019-2020 term by Justice Kavanaugh on July 6, 2020 ) Dupilicate. Was a content-based speech restriction, announced the judgment ) ( Dupilicate submission ) 26 2020... The government, finding unpersuasive the free speech argument networking opportunities for Political consulting and Citizen... By Respondents, American Association of Political Consultants, the court has original jurisdiction—when it the... 'S jurisdiction s perhaps fitting because the case October 21, 2019: United States for... Establishes the court and delivered an ) granted by the Chief Justice extending the scotusblog barr v american association of political consultants file... Inc.Were initially scheduled for April 22, 2020: the U.S. Supreme court decided Barr v.American of! Held that the law could not withstand strict scrutiny and was therefore unconstitutional April! Ass ’ n of Political Consultants, Inc., et al Justice extending the time to file november. Briefs and Documents litigation more … brief for Respondents at 13-14, Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants Inc... Brief of Association of Political Consultants, Inc., et al -- almost certainly more than one at...